|
عندما يصبح شتم الامة العربية (بمجموعها) مهنة البعض!!
هذا ما نشرته جريدة الاتحاد (لسان الاتحاد الوطني الكردستاني) بعددها 817 في 2/9/2004
ابتسم.. أنت في دولة عربية!
بلاد العرب اوطاني ـ يافطة ترفعها 22 دولة
ولا يحق لك الدخول إليها. وان سمح لك بالمرور فستلقى اشد أنواع الترحيب من تسليب وإهانة وبهذلة. لا تستغرب فأنت في إحدى الدول العربية الموت لأمريكا.. وطوابير تصطف على سفاراتها للهجرة إليها!؟
لا تستغرب أنت في دولة عربية مقاطعة أميركا اقتصاديا.
ويشربون الأمريكي ويأكلون الأمريكي ويركبون الأمريكي ويلبسون الأمريكي. وجهازهم الحاسوب الأمريكي ويدخنون الأمريكي ووو، فعليك أن تلتزم بالمقاطعة لانك تعيش في دولة عربية عندما تجد أمة تتكلم كثيرا وتأكل كثيرا وتكذب كثيرا وتغش كثيرا. ومتخلفة كثيرا ولا تستغرب عندما تكون هذه الأمة هي الأمة العربية.
وعندما تجد أن 22 بلدا ودولة ومملكة وامارة. لديها من مشاكل الحدود فيما بينها. مالا تجده في بلدان أخرى. لا تستغرب فأنت في بلاد أمة عربية واحدة من المحيط إلى الخليج.
عندما تجد أن شخصا يترك بلده مغتصبا وشعبه مرهونا بيد محتل وخيراته بيد المستعمر ومع ذلك يترك وطنه ويذهب للدفاع عن بلد آخر. فمن المؤكد أن يكون هذا الحيوان الناطق عربيا.
22 دولة وامارة ومملكة وبلدا.. الخ، تتحدث ليل نهار عن الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان والمرأة والمساواة ولا تجد ولا حكومة واحدة تشفي غليلك بأنها ديمقراطية.
كلها تسبح بمحمد الدكتاتورية لا تستغرب أبدا فأنت في الدولة العربية.
ويا (محلى) هذه الراقصة عندما تذرف الدمع من اجل أطفال فلسطين..
وحفلتها الماجنة تتبرع بها من اجل قضية فلسطين. لان تحرير فلسطين لا تتم إلا بالكشف عن فخذيها العربيين.
ولا اعتقد انك ستجد شعبا يحدثك عن ماضيه التليد وتأريخه العظيم بكل فخر واعتزاز. وبعد أن تقرأ هذا الماضي العظيم. لا تراه إلا وأدا وقتلا. ولا يحدثك إلا وان الخليفة الفلاني. قد قتل أخاه أو أباه لينصب نفسه خليفة وان السلف الصالح لا يتفاخرون ألا بالسلف ولغة القتل والنار. ويقول شاعرهم:
السيف اصدق أنباء من الكتب..
فهل هذه الأمة ليست أمة العرب!؟
لا اعتقد أن مكانا واحدا في العالم نزلت فيه اكبر ديانات ثلاث. وإنها لم تأخذ تعاليم تلك الديانات الإلهية الجميلة وأفكارها النيرة. ألا أمة العرب فإنها الوحيدة التي أصرت على البقاء في جاهيلتها وتخلفها. أمة لا تعشق ألا الدكتاتوريين ولا تتفاخر إلا بالمجرمين. وترفع صور القتلة والانفلاتيين. ولا تتحاور إلا بلغة السكين وتتبع الظلاميين. وتتفق مع الناعقين. هل هذه أمة حية. وتعيش في القرن الواحد والعشرين! إليك المشتكى يا رب العالمين. والسلام على الأنبياء والمرسلين.
بهاء الموسوي
|
|
|  
agaa عدد المشاركات >> 11 التاريخ >> 29/10/2004
|
الاخ بهاء الموسوي اشكرك على كل ذلك و ذكرتنا بالواقع المألم في هذا الزمن اصبح باطن الارض خيرا من ظاهره و لا حولا و لا قوة الابالله
|
أبو جهاد عدد المشاركات >> 71 التاريخ >> 30/10/2004
|
حصاد الغزو الأميركي الهمجي لبلاد الرافدين مهد الحضارة الأنسانية ..
بعض نتائج الحملة الأميركية لتصدير'الديمقراطية والحرية' إلى العراق !
مجلة 'لانسيت' الطبية البريطانية الشهيرة تنشر هذه المعلومات المرعبة:
'قتل الإحتلال الأميركي حوالي 100،000 عراقي خلال عام من الإحتلال ..'
'لقد وجد التقرير بأن غالبية حالات الموت كانت ناتجة عن الضربات الجوية ..'
'وأن نسبة ضئيلة من القتلى كانوا ضحايا للعمليات الإرهابية ..'
'غالبية القتلى هم من النساء والأطفال ..'
'يقول الباحثون بأن تقريرهم النهائي لم يشتمل أرقام ضحايا مدينة الفلوجة المشتعلة
..
ولوهم فعلوا ذلك لكانت أرقام الضحايا إرتفعت بشكل دراماتيكي ..'
صدرالتقريرعن جامعة جونز هوبكنز الأميركية الشهيرة
بالتعاون مع جامعة المستنصرية في بغداد
Medical Journal Estimates 100,000 Civilian Deaths in Iraq War
A new report in the British-based medical journal The Lancet estimates that more
than 100,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the March, 2003 U.S.-led
invasion of Iraq.
The survey found the major cause of death was from airstrikes, and many of the
victims were women and children. A very small proportion of deaths in the study
were related to terrorism.
The researchers did not include deaths in the volatile city of Fallujah in their
final analysis, saying that would have skewed the death toll much higher.
There has been no official figure for the number of Iraqis killed since the
beginning of the war, but some non-governmental groups have estimated it is
between 10,000 and 30,000.
The survey team visited nearly 1,000 Iraqi homes last month. They concede that
their results need further verification, but say the conclusion remains clear:
that violence is a major public-health problem in Iraq.
Some information for this report provided by AP.
http://www.voanews.com/english/2004-10-28-voa65.cfm
The study was funded by the Center for International Emergency Disaster and
Refugee Studies at Johns Hopkins University and by the Small Arms Survey in
Geneva, Switzerland, a research project based at the Graduate Institute of
International Studies in Geneva.
Nearly 100,000 Iraqis May Have Died In U.S.-Led War
POSTED: 1:29 PM EDT October 28, 2004
LONDON -- A survey of deaths in Iraqi households estimates that as many as
100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months after
the U.S. invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war.
There is no official figure for the number of Iraqis killed since the conflict
began, but some non-governmental estimates range from 10,000 to 30,000. As of
Wednesday, 1,081 U.S. servicemen had been killed, according to the U.S. Defense
Department.
The scientists who wrote the report concede that the data they based their
projections on were of 'limited precision,' because the quality of the
information depends on the accuracy of the household interviews used for the
study. The interviewers were Iraqi, most of them doctors.
Designed and conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, Columbia
University and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, the study is being
published Thursday on the Web site of The Lancet medical journal.
The survey indicated violence accounted for most of the extra deaths seen since
the invasion, and air strikes from coalition forces caused most of the violent
deaths, the researchers wrote in the British-based journal.
'Most individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and
children,' they said.
The report was released just days before the U.S. presidential election, and the
lead researcher said he wanted it that way. The Lancet routinely publishes
papers on the Web before they appear in print, particularly if it considers the
findings of urgent public health interest.
Those reports then appear later in the print issue of the journal. The journal's
spokesmen said they were uncertain which print issue the Iraqi report would
appear in and said it was too late to make Friday's issue, and possibly too late
for the Nov. 5 edition.
Les Roberts, the lead researcher from Johns Hopkins, said the article's timing
was up to him.
'I emailed it in on Sept. 30 under the condition that it came out before the
election,' Roberts told The Asocciated Press. 'My motive in doing that was not
to skew the election. My motive was that if this came out during the campaign,
both candidates would be forced to pledge to protect civilian lives in Iraq.
'I was opposed to the war and I still think that the war was a bad idea, but I
think that our science has transcended our perspectives,' Roberts said. 'As an
American, I am really, really sorry to be reporting this.'
Richard Peto, an expert on study methods who was not involved with the research,
said the approach the scientists took is a reasonable one to investigate the
Iraq death toll.
However, it's possible that they may have zoned in on hotspots that might not be
representative of the death toll across Iraq, said Peto, a professor of medical
statistics at Oxford University in England.
To conduct the survey, investigators visited 33 neighborhoods spread evenly
across the country in September, randomly selecting clusters of 30 households to
sample. Of the 988 households visited, 808, consisting of 7,868 people, agreed
to participate in the survey. At each one they asked how many people lived in
the home and how many births and deaths there had been since January 2002.
The scientists then compared death rates in the 15 months before the invasion
with those that occurred during the 18 months after the attack and adjusted
those numbers to account for the different time periods.
Even though the sample size appears small, this type of survey is considered
accurate and acceptable by scientists and was used to calculate war deaths in
Kosovo in the late 1990s.
The investigators worked in teams of three. Five of the six Iraqi interviewers
were doctors and all six were fluent in English and Arabic.
In the households reporting deaths, the person who died had to be living there
at the time of the death and for more than two months before to be counted. In
an attempt at firmer confirmation, the interviewers asked for death certificates
in 78 households and were provided them 63 times.
There were 46 deaths in the surveyed households before the war. After the
invasion, there were 142 deaths. That is an increase from 5 deaths per 1,000
people per year to 12.3 per 1,000 people per year -- more than double.
However, more than a third of the post-invasion deaths were reported in one
cluster of households in the city Falluja, where fighting has been most intense
recently. Because the fighting was so severe there, the numbers from that
location may have exaggerated the overall picture.
When the researchers recalculated the effect of the war without the statistics
from Falluja, the deaths end up at 7.9 per 1,000 people per year -- still 1.5
times higher than before the war.
Even with Falluja factored out, the survey 'indicates that the death toll
associated with the invasion and occupation of Iraq is more likely than not
about 100,000 people, and may be much higher,' the report said.
The most common causes of death before the invasion of Iraq were heart attacks,
strokes and other chronic diseases. However, after the invasion, violence was
recorded as the primary cause of death and was mainly attributed to coalition
forces -- with about 95 percent of those deaths caused by bombs or fire from
helicopter gunships.
Violent deaths -- defined as those brought about by the intentional act of
others -- were reported in 15 of the 33 clusters. The chances of a violent death
were 58 times higher after the invasion than before it, the researchers said.
Twelve of the 73 violent deaths were not attributed to coalition forces. The
researchers said 28 children were killed by coalition forces in the survey
households. Infant mortality rose from 29 deaths per 1,000 live births before
the war to 57 deaths per 1,000 afterward.
The researchers estimated the nationwide death toll due to the conflict by
multiplying the difference between the two death rates by the estimated
population of Iraq -- 24.4 million at the start of the war. The result was then
multiplied by 18 months, the average period between the invasion and the survey
interviews.
'We estimate that there were 98,000 extra deaths during the postwar period in
the 97 percent of Iraq represented by all the clusters except Falluja,' the
researchers said in the journal.
'This isn't about individual soldiers doing bad things. This appears to be a
problem with the approach to occupation in Iraq,' Roberts said.
The researchers called for further confirmation by an independent body such as
the International Committee of the Red Cross, or the World Health Organization.
The study was funded by the Center for International Emergency Disaster and
Refugee Studies at Johns Hopkins University and by the Small Arms Survey in
Geneva, Switzerland, a research project based at the Graduate Institute of
International Studies in Geneva.
Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/3868163/detail.html
ابو جهاد
|
|